Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Engineering Ethics of Titanic Sinking Essay

Utilitarianism Look at the largeWhen takes design a product many an different(prenominal) topics go in to the ending make process when it comes to selecting materials, design, and the manuf lay outuring processes. angiotensin-converting enzyme concern that has forever been in the ratiocination making process is emphasizeing to make sure the effect entrust always be ethically good, although this isnt always the case. Try as they might, no individual is perfect, and accidents do pop off. When engineering disasters happen there argon many factors that may be involved, such as human factors, design flaws, extreme conditions, and materials failures. When these things do happen it is important to look at the ethical grimace of each part of the failure and try to take apart if any champion person could be endow at fault. ace in truth famous and very(prenominal) disastrous engineering failure was when the unsinkable big hit an iceberg and sank. The titanic was a British broadcast originally conceived in 1907 to be a mail and passenger line to go from England to tonic York by the Harland and Wolff Irish Shipbuilding Company and The snow-clad Star Line to compete with the Lusitania and Mauritania which were the two biggest and accelerated steamships at the time. When the big was constructed weighed and astounding 46,000 loads, which was unitary and a half times heavier than the Lusitania and Mauritania. The big was to be far to a ampleer tip extravagant than its counterparts. It had luxurious accommodations for its first curriculum passengers including on- gameboard swimming pools, a gymnasium, bathrooms with stained glass windows and prosperous furniture, and even the styles of decor differed from cabin to cabin. The Titanic overly had a great list of less glamorous rooms to accommodate middle class passengers, which is where they plotted to make a lot of their profit. Although it was more(prenominal) luxurious, the Titanic was slightl y slower than its competitors.The ship set piece of paper on April 10, 1912 for its maiden voyage. It stopped at Cherbourg, France and Queenstown, Ireland to permit on more passengers and mailbefore mountain off for its final destination around evenfall of April 11. The succeeding(a) afternoon, reports of an ice in steamship lanes were comprehend over the radio, simply this was not unordinary for the time of year. As time went on more detailed warnings were beingness received and it became apparent that an ice field position in the path of the Titanic. The ship tried to romp its path twice to miss the ice field, but on the night of April 14, lookouts spotted and iceberg in the immediate path of the Titanic. The ship tried to rear(a) directions when the warning came but it was too late. The Titanic struck an iceberg estimated to be six times more bulky than it. This ca apply the hull, which had become less ductile imputable to the freezing irrigate temperatures, to buck le allowing vast mensurations of piss to fill the ship. The Titanic was constructed with 16 unbendable compartments, and foursome would be able to flood without incident, but this bang caused six of the compartments to flood. In less than three hours the massive shia cultivate of ethics in which the aim of motion should be to create the largest possible p carrying more than 2,200 nation sank in below zero water. lone(prenominal) 705 passengers and crew survived and were picked up by the liner Carpathia the next morning.To fully understand this disaster and its possible causes and turn over outcomes it is important to look at the possible causes individually as well as a whole. It is as well as important to look at them from many distinguishable ethical perspectives, although, for this look at the sinking of the Titanic I befool chosen to focus on a utilitarianism standard. Utilitarianism is a type of ethics popularized by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mills in which the aim of activeness should be to create the largest possible balance of recreation over pain or the greatest gaiety for the greatest fig of people. In other words, each decision should be made to result in the most happiness for the most people. This makes it a form of consequentialism, where the consequences of ones conduct are the supreme basis for any judgment about the faithfulness of that conduct. Jeremy Bentham created an algorithm to de lineine the degree or amount of fun that a specific action is believably to cause. He called this Hedonic Calculus and it was divided into 7 different categories. Bentham based this calculation off of intensity, or the strength of the frolic, distance or how long the cheer allowinging lastly, evidence or how likely it is delight will occur, approach or how soonthe fun will occur, richness or the likeliness it will be followed by delectations, excellence or opportunity that feelings of the opposite will occur, and exte nt or how many people will be affected. I will try to put some of the major failures of the Titanic in to these categories to determine the ethical standing of the engineers trustworthy for the Titanic.When analyzing this disaster the first thing to consider is the engineers design of the Titanic. The Titanic was employing many clean and innovative designs that were believed to make the Titanic the safest ship of all time built at that time. The engineers of the vas made claims that the Titanic was unsinkable and that even in the worst possible accident at sea, the ship should have stayed afloat for two to three days. One of the marks that lead them to this claim was the 16 watertight compartments in the hull of the ship. The way they were designed allowed for up to four compartments to be breached and they ship would still carry on. This feature of the ship would be a good act when looking at it from a utilitarianism bewitch because in all categories of the hedonic calculus i t seems like it will cause the most pleasure for the most subjugate of people. Although the idea was good, it could be argued the execution was not. The compartments were made watertight by watertight doors that could be dropped manually if inundate occurred. This allowed for the compartments to be watertight horizontally, but the rooms had no ceilings, and the walls solely went a few feet above the water line. This meant if a vast amount of water fill up a compartment it could flow over the top of one and run down into another. When applying the calculus to how the compartments were constructed the duration was medium because the walls at least slowed the water down some and hindered the sinking. The certainty and propinquity were good because it allowed for immediate pleasure, conversely the fecundity and extent are poor because the pleasure will be followed by pain when the compartments begin to spill over which would cause for a great subroutine of people to experience pain , with a fewer number experiencing the pleasure.Another decision that led to the eventual decease of the Titanic was the materials chosen for the very important rivets. The swank of the Titanic also made it quite big-ticket(prenominal) to construct. To cut some costs the 3 one million million millionrivets used were made of two different materials, one stronger than the other. Steel rivets were totally used in the primaeval hull of the ship because this is where the engineers thought that the strongest rivets were needed. Weaker iron rivets were used in the stern and bow of the ship. This low note metal used on these parts mazed their integrity and became brittle in extremely bleak waters, like the ones the Titanic would be travelling through. When applying to utilitarianism to this decision it is clear to see that this was a bad action. The duration of the pleasure would only be until something threatened to chance on the weaker rivets, but this is where you would want ple asure the most. It is unlikely that pleasure would continue throughout the support of the ship or happen suddenly so the certainty and propinquity are also bad. It is not likely that the pleasure of cutting costs would be followed by other pleasures so the fecundity and purity would be low. The extent of this possible pain would be very great while the pleasure of saving money would only help a few which is also very bad in a utilitarian sense.The last oversight I will look at is the number of life boats on the Titanic. There was a law that required all vessels over 10,000 tons to have at least 16 life boats on deck. These were considered to be unappealing to the eye, so to try and give the greatest pleasure to their passengers the Titanic only had 20. Even though its massive size would have required over four times as many boats. This decision was made because the Titanic was unsinkable so the life boats were more on board to help save survivors of other boat crashes. This decisio n was initially pleasurable, but due to the circumstances dour out to cause great pain. The duration of the pleasure would be great as long as the boats were never needed. The certainty, propinquity, and extent were all high as long as the boat was above water. exclusively if a crash happened all of these along with the purity and fecundity became very low. This action would have to be considered a bad action because when figure a ship you must consider the worst possible situations.When looking at all these flaws from a utilitarianism view it is clear that short term pleasure was always chosen over the possibility of long term painor pleasure. This resulted in many thing being pleasurable up until the crash, but when designing a product where people lives may be at risk it is important to base your decisions on what would cause the greatest pleasure for the greatest number of people in all possible situations and outcomes. The hubris of the engineers sunless their vision and th ey failed to do this which resulting in the death of 1500 of the 2200 people on board the Titanic when it sank.Bibliography1. http//www.matscieng.sunysb.edu/disaster/2. http//www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/9801/Felkins-9801.html 3. http//www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/4. http//www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/titanic.htm5. http//www.merriam-webster.com/ vocabulary6.http//www.writing.eng.vt.edu/uer/bassett.html7. http//www.titanicuniverse.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.